FEED STATS: DO YOUR SUBSCRIBERS REALLY READ YOUR BLOG? INCREASE ITEM USE

SEO Guide -

Feed Stats: Do Your Subscribers Really Read Your Blog? Increase Item Use
Item Use of the SEO 2.0 Blog Feed: Varying from 28 to 326. Most bloggers and online publishers lately centre on the sort of subscribers as the key metric of journal success. This is not criminal but not entirely correct either. You crapper have lots of subscribers but nearly hour who rattling feature your blog. […]

Most bloggers and online publishers lately centre on the number of subscribers as the key metric of journal success. This is not criminal but not entirely correct either. You crapper have lots of subscribers but nearly hour who rattling feature your blog. Not to mention the nudity fake subscribers which stem from bots, prefetching (Browsers and RSS readers subscribing in front trying to look your interest) and the likes.

Luckily there is a metric which tells us whether grouping who subscribe to a journal rattling feature it, it’s titled Item Use and is provided by Feedburner.

I have a love to hate relation with Feedburner.

It is owned by Google and thus conception of the every encompassing data assemblage heavyweight by the “Microsoft of the Web”. It’s subscriber metrics seem criminal most of the time, especially on the weekends. Or do you rattling think that roughly 5 - 10% of subscribers unsubscribe for the weekend? As far as I know it still provides the prizewinning stats acquirable though.

To be honest my Item Use just a few weeks past was catastrophic, on some days as low as 25 per day which would mean exclusive 1 in 40 subscribers datum my posts.

I wouldn’t mention this if I haven’t dealt with this issue. I increased the Item Use more or less tenfold. This means that I certain ten times more of my subscribers to feature my posts. It’s still wrinkled just 1/4 of them but a completely different number.

What did I do to make my subscribers feature my journal posts?

1. Concentrated on my desirable conference and their needs
2. gave advice they crapper make use of for their daily tasks
3. Followed up on matters I awninged earlier
4. Created added value where the programme were already known
5. Tackled disputable and most imperative current topics

As expected most posts that attracted my subscriber humble to utter on them were not the ones that performed well on social media and the another way around. Social media burners did not action well with my subscribers:

SEO 2.0 virus spreading? Who cares! Only the subcribers

Of instruction you crapper debate that more grouping utter your RSS items when you indite more but it’s not the most important factor, even after I stopped playing the higher reverend engagement was still visible. It does not suffice to indite and publicize more, it depends on how and for whom you write. Subscribers want

• information they haven’t feature everywhere else
• resources they crapper place in use for their possess projects
• articles that deepen their understanding of the topic you indite about usually

RSS readers ofttimes exhibit just a headline or a brief sentence, a paragraph at most. So you should be keen on conveying the message of what the value of a place is up there and not in the last paragraph.

You may resile most of the superlatives and numbers, an advanced journal post does not deal with the “higher and faster” it deals with “deeper” aspects of your trade or topic. You may also resile the images, as you don’t want to draw the hurried to separate absent social users.

Source: feeds.feedburner.com

Digg Traffic Worst Compared to 3 Other Social Sites
It’s no info that SEO 2.0 has more traffic from social media than from search, mostly due to it’s popularity on StumbleUpon and Sphinn. Indeed direct traffic equaled see traffic with 15% each during the last 30 days. These days weren’t rattling very laboring right the huge sound around the Google browser. I got individual dozens […]

It’s no info that SEO 2.0 has more traffic from social media than from search, mostly due to it’s popularity on StumbleUpon and Sphinn. Indeed direct traffic equaled see traffic with 15% each during the last 30 days.

These days weren’t rattling very laboring right the huge sound around the Google browser. I got individual dozens of links immediately from another blogs as well as sites and for a few days I got thousands of visitors from numerous sources.

So while at it and during the remaining of the last 30 days null much happened, besides, yes, likewise that I got in a way “popular” on Digg (where I was belowground before achievement the frontpage) and 3 another social sites where you’d kinda not expect some momentous traffic numbers.

As this journal is apparently an SEO blog it’s important to state that it can’t get on the frontpage of Digg.

Digg blacklists sites that deal with SEO.

So if you’re after deciding traffic sources for a topic or journal that gets blacklisted at Digg as well (and you have tried StumbleUpon already) you might want to know how these sites performed: Mixx, Social|Median, Twitter.

As the trend traffic or sort of visits does not tell you much about the actual grouping visiting your place I compounded the sort of visits with three another metrics of user engagement.

.

What’s apparent, all of these drawing are indeed very insignificant. Still it’s more than most journal links brought and the grouping who fill these social sites are the most astir users of the social web, the early adopters and noesis users. Anyways having just 20 - 30 grouping per month rattling visit you without peppy shows that these sites do not matter as much as you’d like them to.

Take also state that Digg is the poorest entertainer of every these sites. The place I got on Digg had 200 diggs in 24h, individual others have been submitted to Digg too but the traffic was so poor.

So what’s the most important outcome of this not exclusive humorous post? Even Twitter is meliorate than Digg!

Source: feeds.feedburner.com

Tags: professional see engine optimization, seo agency, affiliate internet playing marketing content online, search engine marketing, internet marketing, seo

This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 1st, 2008 at 2:15 am and is filed under Search Engine Optimization. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.