10 CODING GUIDELINES FOR PERFECT FINDABILITY AND WEB STANDARDS
SEO Guide -
10 Coding Guidelines for Perfect Findability and Web Standards
Perfect findability and web standards crapper be achieved with the aforementioned means when it comes to coding. Thus I composed a very ultimate list of 10 writing guidelines for amend findability and web standards everybody crapper easily memorize and implement: Less is more, do not use more cipher than necessary No inline CSS or scripts, try to […]
Perfect findability and web standards crapper be achieved with the aforementioned means when it comes to coding. Thus I composed a very ultimate list of 10 writing guidelines for amend findability and web standards everybody crapper easily memorize and implement:
- Less is more, do not use more cipher than necessary
- No inline CSS or scripts, try to removed noesis from attendance and behaviour
- No huge styles and scripts in the head, externalize (use external files) everything as far as possible
- Use semantic code, make headline headlines (h1, h2, h3 etc.), make important terms bold, credit blockquote etc.
- Don’t use some tautological meta tags (only meta description is a must)
- Use Microformats to make your locate machine readable by e.g. telling robots your study and address
- Use tables exclusive for table data (like for sport scores)
- Use rel=”external” for external links (instead of target=”_blank”) and make them unstoppered in newborn windows by JavaScript (no popups!)
- Use exclusive degradable JavaScript (no JavaScript links)
- Do not load important noesis via Flash or AJAX, ever use stark HTML
If you liked this article you will belike also like my No. I stopped using SEO forums a assemblage ago. Even my favorite one, To exhibit you what great SEO forums alternatives there are, I just composed 7 of them:
- Ning Communities, substance winking and unstoppered forums with agglomerated blogs and many another accord Web 2.0 like extras, there are a few, I participated in a winking regularly until it wasabandoned for good by the admin
- Mixx Groups, topical programme sharing, forums, example is our FriendFeed Rooms, accelerating subject and making them nearly chitchat like, just joined a few rooms, SEM e.g. and SphinnZone and created digit for SEO 2.0 (search marketers are very fragmented there as of today it seems)
- Google Groups, making discussions and knowledge distribution easy, example SEM 2.0, a very helpful digit where I lurk for a few months now
- LinkedIn Groups, taking discover the obscurity discover of forums, many grouping have had success with them
- Facebook Groups, conjunctive with peers in kindred manner to LinkedIn but with more features and possibleness members, care where you’re already at
- Wetpaint Wikis, combine a knowledge humble with discussions, this favourite Wiki solution, I created a but I will use it to physique up a SEO 2.0 knowledge base
Which digit of them do you use and prefer? What do you use them for? Or do you still use to older edifice SEO forums and let newbies flame you?
Source: feeds.feedburner.com
and The Cookies Are
The Fortune Cookies.
From the oppose thingy on the last post, these are the grouping that wanted links:
How do you feel about Google? Mauritius Indian Ocean
Bc Baits with How to Keep an Idiot Busy
Adam Moro’s fortune Cookie Design
Slovenian Designer’s Fortune Cookies with Attitudes
Dark SEO Programming’s 2 Entries
and (updated) Occupied DNDs over at anty
Source: seoblackhat.com
There?s no Such Thing as Advanced White Hat SEO
Google does not want you or your clients sites to surpass ANY higher than they “deserve” to. Google defines deserve; they are a for acquire company.
Lisa Barone had tons of questions after present SMX
“But at the aforementioned time, I couldn’t help but attending that this year’s Advanced exhibit seemed to lean a whole lot more to the grey/black hat lateral of things. I couldn’t help but wonder: When did modern search engine optimization get potty with existence a black hat?“
Right around the time that Google took this stance solidified it:
“Web spam is when somebody tries to wander or take shortcuts so that their Web locate shows up higher [in wager results rankings] than it deserves to exhibit up,” - Matt Cutts
If you are not trying to get your client’s websites to surpass higher than they “deserve”, why should they hire you?
She continued:
“Here are some of the “advanced search engine optimization” techniques I picked up during my time in Seattle.
* There are lots of older sites lying around on the Interwebz with great link juice. Buy them and cipher on that. But do it carefully or Google will garner up on it and set the score.
* Conditional redirects are teh awesome.
* Search marketers don’t requirement ethics. They’re marketers. Check the ethics at the door.
* You crapper never have too many .edu links.
* I requirement to grow some balls, stop fearing Matt Cutts and start purchase links.
Where were the white hat modern search engine optimization techniques in Seattle?”
Hanging discover with the Tooth Fairy and the Loch Nes Monster.
“Why was most of the material presented actuation grey and black hat? “
Because black hat seo is the exclusive locate where there is some development. White hat crapper work, but it’s exactly the aforementioned stuff that worked 6 eld ago. Why do you requirement to go to a word to get 6 assemblage older information?
“Are we supposed to conceive that that’s what modern SEO is - spamming? “
Yes.
“If so, that’s a clump of crap.”
uh oh, call the wambulance . . .
“Or maybe SMX just thinks there’s no digit eligible to teach modern white hat techniques. I guess those folks were discover drinking with every the ladies NOT on the Give It Up panel.”
Is she locution she was discover drinking with every the modern white hats?
“I don’t understand.”
ditto!
“To me, modern search engine optimization is about analytics”,
i wager . .
“it’s about siloing”
Siloing is not exactly news. The top Google termination for SEO Siloing is a Grey Wolf Article from Almost 2 eld ago.
“it’s about perfecting your locate structure so that you don’t have to even vexation about tactics like cloaking for contingent redirects.”
Google Cloaks. The NY Times Cloaks. But I have an unstoppered mind: maybe your head-in-the-sand theory on SEO is the prizewinning strategy. . .
“There have to be another white hat modern search engine optimization techniques discover there.”
Sounds like what they said about SETI.
“Why weren’t they covered?”
Because if you counterbalance a white hat technique that works, the technique gets illegal and the locate gets bitch-slapped. Off-topic Link device will belike be incoming on the chopping block.
Google does not want you or your clients sites to surpass ANY higher than they “deserve” to. Google defines deserve; they are a for-profit company. That means that just about some intentional manipulation will be, by definition, black hat.
Want to sum up white hat SEO? It boils down to:
1) Site Architecture - Can be learned in 4 hours or less.
2) Analytics - Can you install a javascript and log in?
3) PPC - Even though we used to call that SEM . . .
4) Content - which is meliorate handled by copywriters.
Alas! The Emperor has no clothes. There are no modern white hat SEO techniques.
Source: seoblackhat.com
Google Clean Up of Fakes: 10 Most Likely Ban Candidates
Fake breasts by magnopere. Reports rain in that Google plans to decent up the web of fakes which are heralded to gain tending and links. Google “Head of Spam” Matt Cutts has been cited as locution that Google will “penalize” websites that use fakes or lies for gaining popularity. To support Google in this truly important […]
magnopere.
Reports rain in that Google plans to decent up the web of fakes which are heralded to gain tending and links. Google “Head of Spam” Matt Cutts has been cited as locution that
Google will “penalize” websites that use fakes or lies for gaining popularity.
To support Google in this truly important fight against evil on the Web I composed the 10 most likely forbiddance candidates to get the Google death penalty.
I think you will concord with most of them. Also you will surely understand that I can’t link to these fake sites directly in visit not to face a penalisation myself. Here they are:
- Whitehouse.gov for WMDs in Iraq
- Scientology.org for locution they are a “church”
- RIAA.com for feigning they support music
- Microsoft.com for making you utter “Start” when you want to actually switch soured Windows
- Parishilton.com for the fake breasts
- Banksy.co.uk for or entering Museums and leaving his entireness there
- Perezhilton.com for the Castro is dead story
- Borat for misrepresenting Kazakhstan and faking anti-Borat compaigns like stopborat.com
- Mahalo.com for commerce a web directory as a “Web 3.0″ “human supercharged wager engine”
- Apple.com for making grouping believe they are about apples
I’m afeard this locate won’t get illegal for technical reasons so I did not add it to the list, still I think it’s a good candidate:
Google.com for faking a “do no evil” contract while working together with the CIA and the program in China.
Do you know some another sites capitalizing on fakes to get illegal by Google?
Source: feeds.feedburner.com
Tags: seo tips, professional seo consultant, search engine improvement companies, michigan wager engine optimization, seo services provider, ppc management